The governance of London hath long been a matter of singular complexity, and in our present age it hath grown into something approaching absurdity. Three-and-thirty boroughs — many too small to command the resources, the talent, or the standing and authority that modern government requireth — attend upon a city of nine millions, each jealous of its own prerogatives, each duplicating the offices and functions of its neighbour. A recent report hath proposed the consolidation of these boroughs into ten or twelve great authorities, following the principles now applied elsewhere in England through the programme of Local Government Reorganisation. The intent is sound; the method less so.
For to reduce London to a mere ten authorities is to create units of such vast population — approaching a million souls apiece — that they should be ungovernable from any council chamber, and unrecognisable to any citizen as his own place. The purpose of reorganisation is not merely to achieve economy of scale, but to restore to local government a measure of coherence, identity, and accountability. These proposals therefore set down a middle course: the consolidation of London's boroughs into eighteen authorities, each of a size more nearly answerable to the new unitary councils being established across the rest of England.
But the greater ambition of these proposals is this: that where the government's hand falleth upon the map, it should not erase the ancient lines but rather restore them. The Hundreds — Ossulstone, Brixton, Becontree, Blackheath, and the rest — are not antiquarian curiosities. They were the administrative geography of this land for the better part of a thousand years, from the Domesday survey until the Victorian reformers swept them aside in favour of their own rational inventions. The boundaries of the Hundreds reflect real communities, real watersheds, real patterns of settlement and commerce. They are, in short, a better map than most of what hath replaced them.
It is the conviction of your servant that we may move with the times and yet honour what came before us. The reorganisation of London's boroughs representeth precisely such an opportunity — to build authorities that are modern in their capacity, historic in their identity, and rooted in the genuine geography of the places they serve. The proposals for England beyond London's bounds are set forth in Item IV and Item V.
The Eighteen Authorities
Working from whole Hundreds — combining two or more where necessary to reach viable population — and accepting some variance at the edges. The City of London is carved out as a constitutional anomaly in its own right.
| Authority | Historic Basis | Constituent Boroughs | Est. Pop. |
|---|---|---|---|
| City of London | City of London (independent) | City of London | 15,000 |
| Kensington | Ossulstone, Kensington Division | Westminster, Kensington & Chelsea, Hammersmith & Fulham | 544,000 |
| Holborn | Ossulstone, Holborn Division | Camden, Islington | 440,000 |
| Finsbury & Tower | Ossulstone, Finsbury & Tower Divisions | Hackney, Tower Hamlets | 598,000 |
| Edmonton | Edmonton Hundred, Middlesex | Enfield, Barnet | 532,000 |
| Gore | Gore Hundred, Middlesex | Harrow, Brent | 624,000 |
| Elthorne | Elthorne Hundred, Middlesex | Hillingdon, western Ealing | 510,000 |
| Isleworth | Isleworth Hundred, Middlesex | Hounslow, eastern Ealing | 488,000 |
| Spelthorne & Kingston | Spelthorne + Kingston Hundreds | Richmond upon Thames, Kingston upon Thames | 370,000 |
| Southwark | Brixton Hundred, northern division | Southwark, northern Lambeth, northern Wandsworth | 480,000 |
| Brixton | Brixton Hundred, southern division | Southern Lambeth, southern Wandsworth | 520,000 |
| Wallington | Wallington Hundred, Surrey | Northern/central Croydon, Sutton, southern Lambeth | 610,000 |
| Copthorne | Copthorne Hundred, Surrey | Southern Croydon, Merton | 480,000 |
| Blackheath | Blackheath Hundred, Kent | Greenwich, Lewisham | 600,000 |
| Lessness & Ruxley | Lessness + Ruxley Hundreds, Kent | Bexley, eastern Greenwich | 430,000 |
| Bromley & Beckenham | Bromley & Beckenham Hundred, Kent | Bromley, western Bexley | 335,000 |
| Becontree | Becontree Hundred, Essex | Newham, Barking & Dagenham, western Waltham Forest, western Redbridge | 750,000 |
| Havering | Havering Liberty + Waltham Hundred | Havering, eastern Waltham Forest, eastern Redbridge | 554,000 |
Map of the Proposed Authorities
The Historic Hundreds
The pre-London administrative geography — the Hundreds of Middlesex, Essex, Surrey and Kent — upon which these proposals are founded.
Ossulstone
Edmonton
Gore
Elthorne
Isleworth
Spelthorne
Brixton
Wallington
Copthorne
Kingston
Blackheath
Lessness
Bromley & Beckenham
Ruxley
Becontree
Waltham
Havering Liberty
Design Principles
The rules applied throughout this exercise.
Splits used only where identity is genuine
Whole Hundreds, not parts
Historic names preferred over compass points
Former county identity respected
The City of London stands apart
The framework accepts significant variance in population size. The historic Hundred geography produces unequal populations for entirely predictable reasons — the inner Hundreds absorbed explosive Victorian and Edwardian urban growth, whilst the outer Hundreds urbanised late or not at all.
Undersized units accepted: City of London (15,000) — constitutionally unique. Spelthorne & Kingston (370,000) — two Thames-side Hundreds combined, no adjacent Hundred available. Holborn (440,000) — slightly under but historically precise. Bromley & Beckenham (335,000) — genuinely undersize, no adjacent Kent Hundred available for combination.
Oversized units accepted: Becontree (750,000) — kept whole because it had no historic divisions and splitting it would require invented names. Gore (624,000) — at the top of the band but the cleanest available Middlesex combination.
Population figures are 2024 ONS mid-year estimates. Historic Hundred boundaries are based on Victoria County History sources.